PROPT The Brachistochrone Problem (DAE formulation): Difference between revisions

From TomWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 8: Line 8:


<math> E_{kin} = \frac{m}{2} \left( \frac{dx}{dt}^2 + \frac{dx}{dt}^2 \right) ,</math>
<math> E_{kin} = \frac{m}{2} \left( \frac{dx}{dt}^2 + \frac{dx}{dt}^2 \right) ,</math>
<math> E_{pot} = m g y .</math>
<math> E_{pot} = m g y .</math>


The boundary conditions are still A = (0,0), B = (10,-3), and an initial speed of zero, so we have
The boundary conditions are still A = (0,0), B = (10,-3), and an initial speed of zero, so we have


<math> E_{kin} + E_{pot} = 0 </math>
<math> E_{kin} + E_{pot} = 0 </math>


For complex mechanical systems, this freedom to choose the most convenient formulation can save a lot of effort in modelling the system. On the other hand, computation times may get longer, because the problem can to become more non-linear and the jacobian less sparse.
For complex mechanical systems, this freedom to choose the most convenient formulation can save a lot of effort in modelling the system. On the other hand, computation times may get longer, because the problem can to become more non-linear and the jacobian less sparse.

Revision as of 08:06, 9 November 2011

Notice.png

This page is part of the PROPT Manual. See PROPT Manual.

We will now solve the same problem as in brachistochrone.m, but using a DAE formulation for the mechanics.

DAE formulation

In a DAE formulation we don't need to formulate explicit equations for the time-derivatives of each state. Instead we can, for example, formulate the conservation of energy.


The boundary conditions are still A = (0,0), B = (10,-3), and an initial speed of zero, so we have


For complex mechanical systems, this freedom to choose the most convenient formulation can save a lot of effort in modelling the system. On the other hand, computation times may get longer, because the problem can to become more non-linear and the jacobian less sparse.

% Copyright (c) 2007-2008 by Tomlab Optimization Inc.

Problem setup

toms t
toms t_f

p = tomPhase('p', t, 0, t_f, 20);
setPhase(p);

tomStates x y

% Initial guess
x0 = {t_f == 10};

% Box constraints
cbox = {0.1 <= t_f <= 100};

% Boundary constraints
cbnd = {initial({x == 0; y == 0})
    final({x == 10; y == -3})};

% Expressions for kinetic and potential energy
m = 1;
g = 9.81;
Ekin = 0.5*m*(dot(x).^2+dot(y).^2);
Epot = m*g*y;
v = sqrt(2/m*Ekin);

% ODEs and path constraints
ceq = collocate(Ekin + Epot == 0);

% Objective
objective = t_f;

Solve the problem

options = struct;
options.name = 'Brachistochrone-DAE';
solution = ezsolve(objective, {cbox, cbnd, ceq}, x0, options);
x  = subs(collocate(x),solution);
y  = subs(collocate(y),solution);
v  = subs(collocate(v),solution);
t  = subs(collocate(t),solution);
Problem type appears to be: lpcon
Time for symbolic processing: 0.10508 seconds
Starting numeric solver
===== * * * =================================================================== * * *
TOMLAB - TOMLAB Development license  999007. Valid to 2011-12-31
=====================================================================================
Problem: ---  1: Brachistochrone-DAE            f_k       1.869963310229926000
                                       sum(|constr|)      0.000000000033224911
                              f(x_k) + sum(|constr|)      1.869963310263151000
                                              f(x_0)     10.000000000000000000

Solver: snopt.  EXIT=0.  INFORM=1.
SNOPT 7.2-5 NLP code
Optimality conditions satisfied

FuncEv    1 ConstrEv  168 ConJacEv  168 Iter   93 MinorIter  156
CPU time: 0.062400 sec. Elapsed time: 0.071000 sec. 

Plot the result

To obtain the brachistochrone curve, we plot y versus x.

subplot(2,1,1)
plot(x, y);
title('Brachistochrone, y vs x');

subplot(2,1,2)
plot(t, v);

BrachistochroneDAE 01.png